21 Azar and H.I.M. Mohammad Reza
Shah Pahlavi
بيست و يکم آذر ماه 2544 شاهنشاهی
11 درسامبر 2005
Shirin Neshat of Sarbazan to Dr. Bahman Aghai Diba and Persian Journal: A Return
to the 2,500 Year Old Persian Monarchy is the Answer by Shirin Neshat of
Sarbazan
Dr. Bahman Aghai Diba says much that is laudable in the December 8th
Persian
Journal. His observations about the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) regime
can be summarized briefly as follows: the IRI regime is a brutal police state;
its leadership pursues the brutal suppression of basic human rights, especially
for women and political dissidents; the journalistic profession under this
regime is reduced to either prison, death, or playing the role of propgaganda
mouthpiece for the regime; the foreign policy of the Mullahs is largely one of
theocratic extremism and ideological fanaticism, especially in putting Iran in
the middle of the Arab-Israeli conflict; the economic management of this cabal
is consigning a constantly increasing number of Iranians to perpetual misery and
poverty; and Iran is becoming one of the major centers of drug addiction on the
planet. Dr. Diba correctly describes all of this as "acute suppression." He also
understands that with the election this year of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to the
Presidency of Iran, the crisis there and the threat presented by the IRI regime
to the larger world community is more acute than ever.
Ahmadinejad's recent proclamation of the personal reception of a divine aura
during his pathetic podium address to the United Nations General Assembly in New
York, and today's internationally televised remarks casting doubts on the
historicity of the Holocaust (and the need to relocate Israel to a slice of
Germany and Austria), are the latest open windows through which the rest of
civilization may gaze into this man's deranged mind and psyche. Iran does indeed
need a domestic program of nuclear power and fuel cycle--but not in the hands of
this sick and reckless man, or the regime he represents. A miscalculation in the
game of nuclear chess involving the United States, Israel, and the EU-3 may
bring a tragic destruction upon the good and beloved people of Iran well beyond
even that which occurred in the Iran-Iraq War of 1980-88. It could bring about
the eclipse of any possible restoration of the fortunes of Iran as a proud,
independent, autonomous nation-state. Patriotic Iranians presently under the
heel of this regime, patriotic Iranian expatriates, and the world community at
large must not permit this preventable apocalypse to take place. But time is
running out.
Dr. Diba notes that the people of Iran definitely know what they do not want--a
continuation of Islamic theocracy--but do not know what their best alternatives
are in ridding the country of an Islamicized, Arabized regime.
I believe there is only one alternative to an Arabized, theocratic regime of IRI
Mullahs: the return of the 2,500 year old tradition of Persian Monarchy and the
reestablishment of the dedication of the Persian Nation to the principles of
universal human rights articulated by King Cyrus the Great, the great Achaemenid
Monarch of ancient Persia in the 6th century B. C. This, and the absolute end of
Islamic theocracy and the Islamic theocratic constitution of 1979, is the only
solution to a tragedy of unfathomable proportions in the last 27 years that
threatens to mushroom into a caldron of misery and mass death reminiscent of
what befell Europe from 1939-1945.
This is the goal. But what strategy may be crafted which would bring to pass the
reestablishment of Constitutional Monarchy in Iran and the consignment of the
fundamentalist Mullahs to the ashheap of history?
I believe a workable, coherent plan would involve the following: First, the
Western nations would be well served by fair identification of agents of, and
sympathizers with, the Islamic Republic of Iran regime, and deporting them from
their shores as enemies of human civilization. Second, the United States and the
European Union should be working in concert to force the United Nations and the
International Court of the Hague to engage in a full-court legal press of the
Mullahs under the glare of the spotlights of full international publicity, for
their crimes against the people of Iran. The international legal wrangle over
Slobodan Milosevic may well be justified, but if so, how do this man's crimes in
the Balkans compare with the track record of the IRI in Iran since 1979? Or the
threat the latter poses to regional and global peace in an age of asymmetrical
warfare involving nuclear, biological, and chemical capabilities? Third, the
Western nations and petroleum companies must not make the mistake of supporting
ethnic and tribal separatist movements in Iran as an alternative to facing down
Ahmadinejad and the Mullahs once and for all. A unified, autonomous, independent
Iran is a legitimate member of the family of nations. It should not be
sacrificed on the altar of what some perceive as short-term corporate economic
interest at the expense of a revitalized country and ancient heritage. The world
will be watching for the work of unseen hands in Khuzestan, Balochistan,
Kurdistan, and Azerbaijan.
Fourth, the Persian nation, both its indigenous and expatriate constituencies,
must be committed to the taking of risks and personal sacrifice even to the
point of death, to rid our beloved country of this malignant scourge against
humanity. It will take massive funding of human rights organizations of which
Sarbazan is only one. It will take the deployment of massive, but peaceful
demonstrations against the Mullahs around the world's capitals whenever the
opportunity presents itself. It will take the formulation of an underground
network of activists against the IRI regime inside and outside of Iran, to bring
organization and resources to the fight for freedom from theocratic oppression
and fascism. And finally, if all else fails, it will take the development of a
well-trained expatriate paramilitary force under Iranian leadership, to bring to
pass what we cannot expect the West to simply hand to us on a silver
platter--the recovery of our homeland, the restoration of our Persian heritage,
and the reestablishment of a society based on law and justice. And the
foundation of our fight is the unswerving belief that the restoration of the
Persian Monarchy is the key to open the door to our individual and national
redemption. This is the Light which guides the pathway to our Return.
Payandeh Iran, Shirin Neshat
|